What CSNSGP is

The California State Nonprofit Security Grant Program is administered by the California Governor's Office of Emergency Services, known as Cal OES. It funds target-hardening and security enhancements for nonprofits at high risk of a violent attack or hate crime. It is separate from FEMA's federal NSGP and follows its own state notice, calendar, and cost rules.

The 2025-26 cycle made roughly $76 million available across eligible 501(c)(3) nonprofits. Cal OES publishes a Request for Proposals each cycle with the exact caps, deadlines, and allowable-cost rules.

Source: California Governor's Office of Emergency Services, California State Nonprofit Security Grant Program (caloes.ca.gov).

What CSNSGP funds

The program funds target-hardening and security enhancements, and a complete application ties every line item to a documented vulnerability. The RFP names reinforced doors and gates, lighting, access control, and inspection and screening systems directly, and surveillance fits the same target-hardening logic. Each item below reflects how those categories translate into a real nonprofit install.

  • Cameras and video management. Exterior and interior cameras at entrances, parking lots, sanctuaries, classrooms, and approach paths, feeding a central video management system. Cal OES treats surveillance as a target-hardening enhancement when the application ties each camera to a documented vulnerability.
  • Access control and reinforced entries. Card readers, electrified strikes, reinforced doors and gates, and door-position monitoring at main entrances, classroom wings, and after-hours zones. Reinforced doors and gates are named explicitly in the program guidance as allowable target-hardening costs.
  • Lighting and perimeter hardening. Exterior LED lighting at parking lots, walkways, and approach roads, plus fencing and perimeter improvements. Lighting is one of the security enhancements the RFP names directly, and it is frequently underweighted in early applications even though reviewers expect it on a complete plan.
  • Inspection and screening systems. Entry inspection and screening systems for buildings and events. The program guidance lists inspection and screening among the fundable enhancements, which opens a category many applicants overlook when they scope only cameras and access control.
  • Panic buttons and emergency alerting. Fixed or wearable panic and duress buttons in front offices, sanctuaries, and classroom wings that route a documented alert to staff and, where integrated, to local law enforcement. Pairs with the access system so a duress signal can trigger lockdown.
  • Security training and contracted services. Allowable in line with the current RFP, which typically funds a defined slice of training and contracted security personnel alongside the physical hardening. Confirm the current training and personnel caps against the active Cal OES RFP before final budget submission.

Source: Cal OES CSNSGP Request for Proposals. Allowable categories and any per-category limits can shift cycle to cycle. Confirm against the active RFP at caloes.ca.gov before final budget submission.

The award amounts

The 2025-26 CSNSGP round allowed up to $250,000 per location and up to $500,000 across a maximum of two locations. It did not use SVPP's 75/25 federal cost-share structure. Future caps and match rules must be confirmed in the next Cal OES RFP.

The 2025-26 cycle made about $76 million available. That total is cycle-specific and resets with each year's RFP.

Source: Cal OES CSNSGP 2025-26 RFP. Confirm current-cycle figures against the active RFP.

Who is eligible

CSNSGP funds California 501(c)(3) nonprofits at high risk of a violent attack or hate crime because of their ideology, beliefs, or mission. Religious institutions qualify when they meet the 501(c)(3) requirements, including those that meet the requirements without a separate formal IRS determination letter. The threat narrative and the vulnerability assessment carry the application.

  • California 501(c)(3) nonprofits. The applicant must be a California nonprofit described under Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code and exempt under Section 501(a). The organization documents that it is at high risk of a violent attack or hate crime because of its ideology, beliefs, or mission.
  • Religious institutions. Churches, mosques, synagogues, temples, and similar religious institutions qualify when they meet the 501(c)(3) requirements, including organizations that meet those requirements without a separate formal IRS determination letter. Houses of worship are among the most-funded applicants.
  • Faith-based and community nonprofits. Schools, community centers, cultural organizations, and social-service nonprofits operating under a religious or mission-driven affiliation, where the threat narrative connects the mission to a documented risk.
  • Per-location limits. The 2025-26 RFP allowed up to $250,000 per location and up to $500,000 across a maximum of two locations. Future caps must be confirmed in the next Cal OES RFP.

Eligibility rests on a documented threat narrative that names the specific risk and its sources, and a vulnerability assessment that connects that narrative to physical-security gaps at the site. Generic requests without a documented tie back to the threat narrative score poorly. Confirm the current eligibility detail against the active RFP before building the application.

Coordinating CSNSGP with federal NSGP

The most efficient move for a California nonprofit is often to pursue both CSNSGP and the federal Nonprofit Security Grant Program in the same year. They are separate programs with separate funding, and one site assessment can support both applications.

  • CSNSGP (this program). Cal OES, state-funded. Up to $250,000 per location, $500,000 across two. No federal match. Target-hardening scope.
  • Federal NSGP. FEMA, administered through Cal OES as the State Administrative Agency. Up to $200,000 per site, $600,000 per organization. Carries the NDAA Section 889 procurement rule. See our NSGP grant security installs guide.
  • Separate the scopes. Do not assign the same line item to both sources. Confirm the duplication-of-benefits, supplanting, and pending-application rules in both notices before submission.

For the full picture of how state nonprofit-security grants supplement the federal award, see our state NSGP programs reference.

What Tec-Tel provides on a CSNSGP project

Tec-Tel produces the security-design and documentation a complete CSNSGP application needs, and installs the system if the award lands. That is four deliverables, each tied to the program's allowable scope.

  • Site assessment. A walking assessment with your security committee, facilities lead, and clergy or leadership. We document the existing camera and access posture, identify gaps against the CSNSGP target-hardening categories, and mark up a floor plan with photographs and a vulnerability matrix. The same factual assessment can inform a separate federal application, while each funding scope remains distinct.
  • Threat-narrative-aligned technology recommendation. Every line item in the bill of materials references the allowable-cost category and the documented vulnerability it addresses. Reinforced doors under the named hardening category, a camera position because the narrative names a specific risk, screening at the entrance under inspection systems. Reviewers score whether each request maps to allowable scope and a documented need.
  • NDAA-aware vendor selection. CSNSGP is state funding, so the federal 889 rule does not automatically attach. We still default to an NDAA-compliant bill of materials, because most CSNSGP applicants also pursue federal NSGP, and covered equipment is a cyber-risk on any security system. Hikvision, Dahua, Hytera, Huawei, ZTE, and Lorex are excluded by default.
  • Signed vendor scope and pricing. A scope and pricing letter on Tec-Tel letterhead, valid through the review cycle, confirming the install timeline and our 15-year nationwide integrator track record. Pricing holds so the awarded budget matches the install cost when funds release.

What Tec-Tel does not do. We do not write the grant narrative, we do not sign as the applicant, and we do not replace your grant consultant. Grant writing is the nonprofit's job. Our job is the security-design and documentation that scores well alongside their narrative, and the install once the award lands. Keeping the applicant's voice and the vendor's documentation distinct reads stronger to a reviewer.

The install timeline once awarded

Three to eight months of active work is a realistic range for a single building, once contracting and design freeze close.

  • Months one and two: Contracting, final design freeze, and long-lead hardware orders. Reinforced doors, specialty glazing, and any custom items get ordered first.
  • Middle months: Cabling, electrical, and mounting. Most of the visible work happens here. Coordination with programming runs through facilities and leadership so installs do not collide with services or events.
  • Final months: Commissioning, training for staff and volunteers, and reimbursement paperwork. Acceptance testing produces the documentation that closes out the award.

Multi-location organizations stretch the timeline across cycles. Standardizing on one video management system and one access platform across sites means each subsequent location costs less to deploy and the paperwork compounds in the same direction. For the install side of any grant-funded project, see our grant install playbook, which follows the same award-to-commissioning rhythm.

Last verified: 2026-08-20. The 2025-26 cycle closed December 12, 2025. No 2026-27 RFP was located on the official Cal OES program pages as of this review. Confirm the next cycle at Cal OES before relying on any cap or deadline.